The Federal High Court in Abuja has granted Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), yet another opportunity to respond to the terrorism charges filed against him by the Federal Government.
Justice James Omotosho set November 7, 2025, as the new date for Kanu to either open his defence or formally waive his right to do so.
This marks the fourth time the IPOB leader has been given such an opportunity since the prosecution concluded its case in June 2025, after presenting five witnesses.
Kanu Challenges Validity of Terrorism Charges
During the latest proceedings, Kanu argued that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act, under which he is being tried, had been repealed, and therefore the charges are legally defective.
He maintained that continuing the trial without amending the charges violates the Supreme Court’s directive, which instructed the Federal Government to review and update its case.
“I will not proceed with a defence until the charges are legally valid,” Kanu told the court, insisting that he needed to consult further with his legal team.
Despite his stance, the court reaffirmed that a prima facie case exists against him, meaning there is sufficient evidence for him to respond to.
Judge Urges Cooperation
Justice Omotosho acknowledged Kanu’s concerns but advised him to cooperate with his lawyers and engage with the legal process.
The judge stressed that fairness required giving him time to consult with his defence team — which includes Aloy Ejimakor, Maxwell Okpara, Nnaemeka Ejiofor, and Mandela Umegborogu.
The Federal Government’s lead counsel, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), had earlier urged the court to compel Kanu to begin his defence immediately, but Justice Omotosho opted to grant an adjournment in the interest of justice.
Next Hearing Set for November 7
The matter has been adjourned to November 7, 2025, when Kanu is expected to either commence his defence or formally waive his right to do so.
The case continues to draw national and international attention, given its high-profile political and legal implications.
