Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has stated that publicly attacking him has become the easiest way for individuals to benefit financially from Rivers State politics.
Wike made the remark on Saturday during a briefing with political stakeholders from Ahoada East and Ahoada West Local Government Areas of Rivers State.
Comment Made at Stakeholders’ Briefing
The briefing followed the annual thanksgiving ceremony of the Chairman of the South-South Development Forum and former Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Chibudom Nwuche. The event was held in Ochigba community, Ahoada East LGA.
Speaking at the gathering, Wike described Rivers State as a long-standing “cash cow” in Nigerian politics, suggesting that political actors often exploit public criticism of his person to gain access to resources.
“Say You Will Deal With Wike”
According to the minister, openly declaring opposition to him has become a common tactic for securing financial support.
“How you can make money from Rivers State is that you go and say, ‘Enough is enough for Wike,’ ‘We will deal with Wike,’ and then they release money,” Wike said.
“If you don’t say you will deal with Wike, you won’t get anything. Once you make those statements, something will come down.”
He made the remarks in a light but pointed tone, drawing reactions from those in attendance.
High-Profile Attendance
The thanksgiving ceremony and subsequent briefing were attended by several prominent political figures, including Senator Magnus Abe, Senator Philip Aduda, Senator Wilson Ake, and Senator Olaka Wogu.
Members of both the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the All Progressives Congress (APC) from Ahoada East and Ahoada West LGAs were also present at the event.
Political Context
Wike, a former governor of Rivers State, remains a dominant figure in the state’s political landscape. His comments come amid ongoing political realignments and debates over control, influence, and resource allocation within Rivers State politics.
The remarks have since sparked discussions online, with supporters and critics offering differing interpretations of his statements.
